Which practice area is responsible for conducting retrospective meetings to identify successes and problems after project phases?

The practice area that is responsible for conducting retrospective meetings to identify successes and problems after project phases is causal analysis and resolution. This area focuses on understanding and analyzing the causes of problems and successes within a project, which is crucial for continuous improvement.

In the context of retrospective meetings, teams gather to reflect on completed project phases, discussing what went well and what challenges they faced. This reflective process aids in identifying root causes for issues, allowing organizations to implement changes and improvements in future projects. By analyzing both successes and failures, organizations can build upon their experiences, ultimately enhancing their processes and outcomes.

Other practice areas such as quality assurance, risk management, and performance evaluation play vital roles in project management but do not specifically focus on the retrospective analysis of project phases as part of their core responsibilities. Quality assurance emphasizes ensuring that processes are followed and outputs meet standards, while risk management deals with identifying, analyzing, and mitigating potential risks. Performance evaluation is centered on assessing the performance outcomes and effectiveness of the processes and people involved. However, none of these areas specifically encompass the retrospective meetings aimed at examining successes and problems in the same way that causal analysis and resolution does.