Which Practice Area is designed to identify issues with the assistance of fellow experts?

The Practice Area that is designed to identify issues with the assistance of fellow experts is Peer Reviews. In the context of CMMI, peer reviews involve collaboration among team members or experts to evaluate work products, processes, or performance. The primary goal of this practice is to uncover defects and areas for improvement through constructive feedback and collective insights.

Peer reviews not only help identify problems in the work being reviewed but also facilitate knowledge sharing, improve team collaboration, and enhance the overall quality of the deliverables. By engaging multiple perspectives, the likelihood of catching issues early in the development or project lifecycle increases, leading to more effective solutions and improvements.

The other practice areas mentioned serve different purposes. Process Monitoring focuses on tracking and evaluating the performance of processes but does not specifically encourage expert collaboration like peer reviews do. Causal Analysis is centered on identifying the root causes of problems after they have occurred and may not involve peer input as directly as peer reviews. Quality Control aims to ensure that products meet quality standards, but it typically deals with verification and validation rather than collaborative identification of issues through expert involvement.