What practice is used to identify defects via peer examination of work products?

Peer Reviews, often referred to as PR, are a systematic practice where colleagues examine each other's work products to identify defects, issues, or areas for improvement. This collaborative approach allows for diverse perspectives on the work and enables team members to catch errors that the original creator might overlook due to familiarity with the content. During a peer review, participants typically analyze the work for quality, adherence to standards, and potential enhancements, leading to a more refined end product.

This process not only helps in identifying defects early in the development cycle but also fosters knowledge sharing among team members, encouraging best practices and continuous improvement. Engaging in peer reviews aligns with the principles of quality assurance in CMMI, where the focus is on ensuring that processes and work products meet defined quality standards before progressing further in the project lifecycle.