If there are ongoing issues with poor quality, which of the following Practice Areas might address this problem?

Choosing both peer reviews and verification and validation as a way to address ongoing issues with poor quality is insightful because both practice areas are integral to ensuring that quality standards are met throughout the development process.

Peer reviews are a collaborative approach that involves team members evaluating each other’s work. This practice not only identifies defects early in the project lifecycle but also provides opportunities for knowledge sharing and continuous improvement. The act of having peers review work fosters a culture of accountability and encourages adherence to quality standards, which is essential when problems with quality persist.

On the other hand, verification and validation are systematic processes designed to ensure that a product meets specified requirements and is fit for use. Verification checks whether the product was built correctly according to the specifications (the right thing is built), while validation checks whether the right product was built for the customer’s needs (the right thing is built for the right reason). Together, these processes help identify any discrepancies that may contribute to quality issues and provide a way to systematically address them.

The combination of peer reviews and verification and validation creates a robust framework for improving quality. By employing both methods, organizations can create multiple checkpoints that catch potential defects early, thus leading to higher-quality outcomes and reducing the risk of recurring quality issues. This multifaceted approach helps